Sometime back, Aamir Khan was reviled because his wife was disturbed by what she read in the newspapers and for the sake of their son, wondered if they should settle in another country. Khan said loud and clear that it shocked and devastated him that his wife could feel that level of fear. In the days to come however , he was trolled on social media, painted as an anti-national citizen, lost prestigious endorsements and was at the receiving end of more hate and virulence than he has ever received in his long career. All in the name of the nation, he had clearly said, he loved. He was chosen to be disbelieved and both he and Shahrukh Khan were and are reminded, just like Beyonce was in the US, for showcasing the pain, power and persecution of Black lives during the recent Super Bowl, that their job is to entertain, to be grateful for being given opportunities that had made them rich and famous and not talk of stuff that well, they are too fortunate to have encountered first hand. So what if Shahrukh’s car was stoned recently or threats are being articulated loud and clear that their films will not be allowed to run in theatres. And how dare Beyonce politicise entertainment? Can’t she just sing and dance? So what if some black lives do not matter, she is a celebrity and successful, isn’t she?
**
A few weeks ago, a young student Rohith Vemula committed suicide because of a system that took away his will to fight for his dreams. And the debate that ensued in the wake of his death also touched upon, among many other issues, this all important query, “Was he a Dalit, really?” Because that question was somehow more important than the circumstances that had pushed him over the brink. The only thing they could not call him was, ”anti-national” because he was, well, dead already. Imagine if he had chosen to fight like JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar who was arrested for..hold your breath…yes, nothing less than sedition. A word that literally means, “Conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.” Was Kanhaiya rebelling against India or those who run it? And who is this authority of state meant to protect? Not boys like Kanhaiya for sure, whose mom, an Anganwadi worker, earns around Rs 3000 a month and raised him in an impoverished home.
**
He has been arrested and he and his young friends are being painted with the unforgiving tar of the damning word, ”anti-national” because they took on politics of division. Before his arrest, Kanhaiya delivered a speech in Jawaharlal Nehru University campus which only a few independent news purveyors have dared to air in full (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMi0D__l7IEJNUSU). In fact sometime in the middle of the 20 minute monologue, you heard an onlooker say, “Yeh media wale nahin chalayenge,” and they did not. And for good reason. Because Kanhaiya spoke for dalits, for women, for minorities and against the suppression of independent thought in our universities. He spoke of how Gajendra Chauhan was foisted upon the FTII. How those who speak of women as goddesses are abusing his mother by sending him vile messages. How violence was not just about shedding blood with a gun. How institutionalised violence disempowered citizens and must be resisted.
**
He spoke against the RSS and the ABVP. He said, he did not need a patriotism certificate from the RSS because he believes in the Constitution and the ideology of Ambedkar. He spoke about how the same forces that are branding some students as anti-national will come asking for their votes during elections. He spoke about the danger of the media becoming the mouth-piece of the government like it was during the Emergency. He spoke about the demons of “jaativaad, manuvad and Brahmanavaad” that needed to be fought. For those who will jump at the thought that he was reviling a religion, it is important to underscore what young people feel when they are denied the entitlement that comes when one is part of a ”majority” be it socio-cultural, religious or economic. Forget Dalits, remember how black and north-eastern students are treated sometimes in our cities? How voluble, ‘parkati‘ women are willed to stay invisible and silent because if they spoke their minds, wore what they wanted, they would somehow tilt the balance of everyone’s moral universe?
**